On the Job: Governor Snyder's Priorities

By: Sherene Tagharobi Email
By: Sherene Tagharobi Email

The governor seemed comfortable walking into his new job Monday morning. Staffers spent Sunday settling into their new office. By Monday, the governor was meeting with more than a dozen senior staff members. Governor Rick Snyder says he wants to map out a two year budget by July.

"Seven weeks is a year, and that's how I like to measure time. We're going to say there are 3.7 dog years in those 182 days so can we get four years of work done in six months?" he asked.

Whether the governor can speed up the budget process remains to be seen, but based on his agenda the first day on the job, he isn't wasting any time.

"I'm excited. I've got meetings with Mike Finney on economic development and John Nixon on the budget, so if you want to go through your priority list, that's where we've been the last couple years in terms of what needs to be done and we're going to follow through on that starting today," Snyder said.

Political analyst Jeff Williams says the governor is wise to propose a two year budget rather than ask legislators to make dramatic cuts this year and next.

"We're down to the cuts no one wants to make," said Williams of Public Sector Consultants. "The cuts in departments everyone has held harmless."

Departments like social services, education, and corrections -- three areas the state is spending billions. Williams says it's going to take major cuts -- not small ones here and there -- to balance the budget.

"When the car payment is due you don't immediately look under the sofa for loose change," Williams said.

Governor Snyder says his administration will focus on making government more efficient, hoping that'll solve budget problems without new revenue.

The governor plans to issue executive orders this week, formalizing some organizational changes like splitting the departments of Natural Resources and Environmental Quality.

The governor may have left the business world for politics -- but that doesn't mean he isn't bringing a bit of it with him to the Capitol.

He talked this morning about inspiring entreprenuership, the idea being business-friendly policy will lead to more jobs.

Snyder's spokesperson says he'll also take a business approach to governing.

That means he'll take what successful private companies are doing and apply it at the state level.

Williams says there are lessons to be learned from business -- but it's a delicate line to walk.

"Businesses can choose to not have product lines," he said. "It's very difficult as a state to choose to not have product lines. The state will be running jails no matter what. The state will be running schools no matter what."

And Williams says perhaps there will be things the state will have to stop doing -- such as sharing revenue with cities.

It's already cut back on revenue-sharing over the last few years, but with a 1.8 billion dollar hole to close, municipalities may have to look to taxpayers to fund services traditionally paid for or subsidized by the state.

You must be logged in to post comments.

Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
  • by LeAnn Location: Webberville on Jan 4, 2011 at 11:24 AM
    "lansing", HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Just keep believing that, and I bet the Easter Bunny really will show up at your door this April too, and the Great Pumpkin at Halloween, and so on and so on. Your "silver lining" is a lovely fairy tale to dream about, but sadly, like the rest of us, you'll be waking up to the same nightmare soon enough.
  • by Ricardo Location: Lansing on Jan 4, 2011 at 06:44 AM
    This "revenue sharing" process is a waste of money. The state, and federal government too, take way too much money from the local people, then have a huge staff that "oversees" the distrubition. This overhead greatly reduces the actual funds available. Eliminate this proceedure, and let the local people keep all of the money in their communities. This would let the people prioritize local improvements and make much more efficient use of funds! Local people using local funds to make local improvements. Makes sense to me. Thank you. Ricardo
  • by Dan Location: DeWitt on Jan 4, 2011 at 01:14 AM
    I agree with Paul on the cut in revenue sharing. That will lead to either a gaping hole in local service, or a simple shift in the tax burden from the state to local municipalities. I would hope that the state would look solely at "social services" i.e. welfare as a source of major sweeping cuts. We need to focus restoring essential services to those that still pay for them, and eliminating those services the government has no business providing in the first place.
  • by lansing on Jan 3, 2011 at 05:13 PM
    Thank god, help has arrived. There is a silver lining for THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN.
  • by Paul Location: Traverse City on Jan 3, 2011 at 03:55 PM
    If Snyder plans to cut revenue sharing to balance the budget only to have local governments increase taxes, he will accomplish just as much or little as Granholm. We will find out very soon what this guy is about.
WILX 500 American Road Lansing, MI 48911 517-393-0110
Copyright © 2002-2016 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 112830739 - wilx.com/a?a=112830739
Gray Television, Inc.