Those Arrested Will Now Be Forced To Give a DNA Sample
Save Email Print
Updated: 2:51 PM Jul 1, 2009
Those Arrested Will Now Be Forced To Give a DNA Sample
Beginning Wednesday, law enforcement will have a new tool they say to solve more crimes... DNA.
Posted: 11:13 PM Jun 30, 2009
Reporter: Jamie Edmonds
Email Address: jamie.edmonds@wilx.com
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM

Well, that's the heart of the problem, Sara. You are agreeing with this measure in one post, yet contradicting yourself in another. They are talking about taking DNA samples whether you are innocent OR guilty. Once you're arrested, they take the sample. Not everyone arrested is guilty. So, innocent people ARE having their rights taken away.
Posted by: St. James Location: St. Johns on Jul 2, 2009 at 02:05 PM

If, If, If, thats all they used it for is to fight crime, it might be all right. What if they used it to abort your unborn child becuase you and spouse, DNA make up presented less than perfect results? What if they used it for increased fees(tax) on universal health care that is rationed to the peasants? What if they use it to determind what part of the country you live in? What if they use it to restrict the food you can buy at the Gov-Mart store? What if they use it for passage through the security check point in the case of a swine flue out break? Not that I have anything to worry about, I have my tin-foil hat on???
Posted by: Sara Location: East Lansing on Jul 2, 2009 at 01:26 PM

I don't understand what's so complicated? Don't commit a "violent felony" and you won't have your rights to privacy taken away. When you act in ways that could hurt the rest of the innocent population, yes, we are going to infringe on your rights to keep others safe. I do, however, agree with "innocent until proven guilty". The article says those who are "arrested" will have to give DNA. I would definitely agree that a person would have to be convicted in a fair trial before their "rights" (which are in my opinion priveleges for people who follow the law) were taken away. When someone is proven guilty of harming innocent people, though, I believe that it is neccessary to take certain measures to make sure they do not hurt anyone again.
Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2009 at 06:31 AM

Or, Sara, perhaps people who care about their civil rights might be upset about this. You judge everyone on such simple terms when this is far more complicated than that. I heard this "the only people that should be upset about it are people who have something to hide" argument when the last administration was listening in on our phone lines too. Innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.
Posted by: Sara Location: East Lansing on Jul 1, 2009 at 04:05 PM

Good! For everyone who does not agree with this, ask yourself if you would feel differently if someone you loved was killed and the only link to the murderer was DNA. If that DNA was in a database, wouldn't you be happy that a killer was brought to justice? It may be infringing upon our rights in some ways, but it is going to protect the innocent a lot more than it will hurt the guilty. In my opinion, the only people that should be upset about it are people who have something to hide.
Posted by: George Location: Lansing on Jul 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Another step into an Orwellian future... We need to fight this.
Posted by: Rob Location: Lansing on Jul 1, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Anonymous: The government has a right to fire leadership in a company it owns majority stake in. Anyway, Put your tinfoil hats away guys, you have nothing to worry about if you're not out beating people up.
Posted by: Kris Location: Dansville on Jul 1, 2009 at 09:12 AM

It's pretty simple. Don't get arrested, and you won't have to give a sample. Duh. What are you guys worried about?
Posted by: Gus Location: S. Lansing on Jul 1, 2009 at 07:03 AM

Again...We are losing all rights in this country and people are just rolling over and accepting it! The government wont stop on this issue until they are allowed to take our DNA samples at the birthing rooms when children are first born! WAKE UP PEOPLE! YOU ARE LOSING YOUR RIGHTS AND YOU DON'T EVEN CARE
Posted by: sandy on Jul 1, 2009 at 02:03 AM

why they jusy put everyone in the data base,that way theres no pointing the finger on race or anyone,its just about that way to get a job ,etc.
Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM

THIS IS HOGWASH! the majority of arrests for DUI's and failure to pay child support, should not have to GIVE DNA samples. This is WRONG..but hey, DEMOCRAPS leading their way in GOV, pretty soon we'll have to give our FIRST BORN. The Census is even starting to get into YOUR PERSONAL BIZ...watch out..The Govt will be watching your every move.. GPS to track where you live.. The GOVT is already becoming INTRUSIVE..Since when have you heard that a President of the USA has the right to fire a GM leader?? NEVER until now.
wilxTV Tweets...
Here's the latest update from WILX!
    WILX Poll
    Should Police Be Allowed To Use Tasers On Suspects?

    Yes
    No


    AP Videos
    WILX.com on Demand
    News Ten Mobile
    News, Sports & Weather Information On Your Cell
    Instant Alert
    Breaking News and Weather Alerts On Your Computer
    Daily e-News
    News & Weather Updates Delivered Via Email
    WILX iWitness
    Submit Your Pics and Video
    Weather Source
    Your 24 Hour Local Weather Channel
    Twitter
    News Headlines, Short and Sweet