WILX Home ·  Station Info
     
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Downloads  ·   Apartment Guide  ·   Job Search  ·   Breakroom  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   Car Soup
What's Going Around · Medical Breakthroughs · Recalls · Polls · Schools · Seen on Ten · Money · News Tips · Money Talks · Going Green · Crime
The Binge Drinking Debate Save Email Print
Posted: 9:02 PM Aug 19, 2008
Last Updated: 2:04 PM Aug 20, 2008
Reporter: Jamie Edmonds
Email Address: jamie.edmonds@wilx.com

A | A | A

These days it seems binge drinking has become just another part of the college experience.

"You get to campus and it's like you're put in this whole new environment, everyone's getting so drunk," MSU Senior Matt Doyle said.

An epidemic, some say, which is why about a hundred presidents from across the country are are taking a stand... asking lawmakers to lower the legal drinking age from 21 to 18.

"Eighteen, 19 and 20-year-olds need to act like adults and we need to start treating them as adults," The Ohio State University President E. Gordon Gee said.

The Amethyst Initiative --- started about a year ago -- was meant to spark debate.

The idea? Lower the drinking age and suddenly it's less attractive for students to binge on alcohol.

"I think they would be less likely to drink," Freshman Jason Lintjer said.

"I think people are going to drink anyways, drinking happens in college," Alum Erin Brooks said.

MSU's president Lou Anna K Simon did not sign the initiative. The university said they're focus is on education.

"We have a very aggressive education and prevention program," Dennis Martel said.

Martel, director of MSU Health Education, said it's not so much about age, but about activity.

"Instead of focusing on consumption and necessarily stopping people from drinking underage, we focus on high risk behaviors and activities," Martel said.

MADD is against the initiative saying lowering the drinking age will only increase the number of drunk driving accidents.

Captain Kim Johnson of the East Lansing Police Department has to agree.

"Having alcohol at 18 to 20-years-old would only increase our workload," Johnson said.

Clearly this debate will continue far beyond the start of classes.

More Stories
Some Say a GM Bankruptcy Is Not an Option

Graduation Requirements May Change

Big 3 Lay out Viability Plans & Bailout Requests

Expanding Graduation Requirements

Dental Student Gets Millions

Locally Made Cars Not Among Top Sellers

Local UAW Union Leaders Head to Detroit

Schools Trim, Worry About Economy

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Kelly Location: Lansing on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Academics -- the smartest people in the world! How about the laziest people in the world? What they're really saying is, "OOOooooo, it's toooooo hard to teach young people about the problems associated with drinking, so let's just give up and give in." Again, the dummying down of America at the hands of so-called educators. Be reminded that these morons receive their very large salaries, benefits and pensions from us, the taxpayers!

Posted by: lost brother in drunk driving accident Location: michigan on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:00 AM
Lower the age?Are they crazy.Raise the age to 25 and maybe some of there stupidity will be out of their system?Crack down on who buys underage people booze.kick out of school the ones in college that choose to do this drinking ect.Don't be responsible for letting kids drink.They party,drive ect.Many turn in alocholics later down the road.Many end up in serious car accidents ect.Rather stupid on anyones part to even think of lowering age.Must have to do with sales and profits in the market.It won't stop them from drinking just add to many problems they don't need.Big profits will be gained by the sellers and get them off the hook for selling to minors if caught.It has nothing to do with age of drinking,just stupidity of thoes allowing it and buying for kids under age.Like smoking,get them hooked then make sales.Drugs included.

Posted by: teacher Location: lansing on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:39 AM
lowering the drinking age also brings more alcohol into the high schools, since the 18 year old students can legally purchase booze, they can also leave at lunch, drink and come back to school. They also provide it to their younger friends, which brings binge drinking even further down in age. I think the colleges are focusing on their issues and their unwillingness to enforce the law and not caring about who else this impacts.

Posted by: Jens Dynenloefter Location: Copenhagen on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:49 AM
Alcohol is just too serious to let people start drinking without parental supervision. In Denmark youth start drink at aged 15 when parents introduce alcohol to them at their confirmation. So binge drinking are never an issue because parents accept drinking and can intervene because the youth drink in their presence. We also have adult supervised bag-parties where youth only can drink from their own tagged bag. Slower drinking means longer partying, because the party is over once the bag is empty. All restrictions only result in secret lives by the teens and introduction to drugs because it is often the same people who provide both alcohol and drugs.

Posted by: Akok Location: Lansing on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:50 PM
Teen drinking is already PROBLEM in this Nation. Lowering that age standard will only increases the number cases that the law officers are already dealing with, and it's going to put more inoccence people at risk even more. I believe whoever came up with this notion is not really making scense at all.I think some people do not get the idea of going to college. it is not their job to lower the drinking age. but it is their responsibility to educate those students so they can do something productive with their lives after graduating from college. also, i believe that it should be upto those students who are 21- years of age or younger to decide what to do with their lives: continue educating themselves OR DRINK? I already know how crazy it can be sometimes at MSU's campus.So i am glad that the MSU's President decided not to sign the initiative.

Posted by: Charles Location: Unadilla on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:29 PM
I disagree with MADD, if younger people are legally allowed to drink there will be no issues with parties getting "Busted", therefore the problem of drunk people fleeing in vehicles will be eliminated

Posted by: phillip Location: lansing,mi on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:20 PM
i agree with the ohio state university president.

wilxTV Tweets...
Here's the latest update from WILX!
    WILX Poll
    Should Lawmakers Cut Education Spending To Balance The Budget?

    Yes
    No


    AP Videos
    Stay Connected With News Ten

       10 to Go
       News Weather & Video

       Breaking News & Weather
       Download Free to Your Computer

       My 10
       Submit Your Pictures and Videos Here

       Blogs
       News Sports Weather Life

       Espanol
       Clic Aqui Para Leer En Espanol

       Tell Us More
       Tell Us More

       RSS
       Get Your RSS Feeds Here RSS Readers    and Codes

       Weather Source
       24 Hour Local  Weather Channel

       Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce
       Latest Developments in Mid-Michigan