Headlines

Comments for Proposal 6: International Crossing
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.

Posted by: spanky Location: Clinton County on Nov 7, 2012 at 06:25 AM

Why would we want to put all our eggs in one billionaires pocket? With another bridge owned by another entity there can be competition.

Posted by: rwill Location: Lansing on Nov 6, 2012 at 02:44 PM

This proposal had better fail, or I will have to assume that this state is full of MOROUNS!!!

Posted by: Sandi Location: Location on Nov 6, 2012 at 01:28 PM

An International Bridge should be owned by th two countries not by a family. A family who has made millions and millions from owning the current bridge. Rather see the millions go to the state for schools, road, and other things.

Posted by: Darrell Location: Lansing on Nov 6, 2012 at 08:22 AM

Well, if Jason says it, it must be true.

Posted by: David Location: MI on Nov 6, 2012 at 07:28 AM

Voted NO on Proposal 6. We don't get to vote on any other major infrastructure projects so why is this bridge any different? And Canada is footing the bill so I can't see how anyone can be against that. The ads you see on TV fail to mention that Proposals 2-6 will change our constitution and that should be left alone! Let's stop the Moroun monopoly today!

Posted by: Jason Location: Jackson on Nov 5, 2012 at 10:01 PM

This proposal had better pass, or I will have to assume that this state is full of MORONS!!!

WILX Mobile Site Home

Full Site - Contact Station