WILX Home ·  Station Info
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Job Search  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   iWitness Photo/Video  ·   10toGo  ·   Instant Alert  ·   World News
Recipes · Restaurants · Community · School Closings · Lottery · Entertainment · Money · Breakroom · Apartment Guide · Repair Don’t Replace · Summer Guide
National Health Care Debate Hits Michigan Save Email Print
Posted: 7:20 PM Jun 30, 2009
Last Updated: 7:57 PM Jun 30, 2009
Reporter: Lauren Zakalik
Email Address: lauren.zakalik@wilx.com

A | A | A

Stage four liver cancer is ravaging Janice Arntz's body.

 
Should The Government Guarantee Health Care For All?
Yes
No
 

The woman from St. Johns has health insurance, but the costs are so high, she says, that it's becoming nearly impossible to get the treatment she needs.

"I was told if I can't pay for it, to let the cancer take its course and not have any treatment," Arntz says.

Arntz says if this is happening to her and she has insurance, she can only imagine what's happening to the more than 1 million in Michigan without coverage.

It's reason enough, she says, to support President Barack Obama's health care plan, which would offer government-run insurance to those who need it.

"We want people to keep the health care they have if they want to, and we will do that. We will build on the positives and fix what's broken," says Sen. Debbie Stabenow, (D) Michigan.

There's no question something needs to be done to help the tens of millions of uninsured Americans. But not everyone agrees President Obama's plan is the way to do it.

"I don't think a government run health care program is the answer for the U.S.," says Rep. Mike Rogers, (R) Michigan.

Rogers says countries that have government-run health care see longer wait times for treatment or, sometimes, no treatment at all.

Plus, he says, it'll raise taxes for everyone. Some are putting the cost of a nationwide health plan in the trillions.

"We're going to go into tremendous amounts of debt, taxing people to find coverage for 15 percent of people [who don't have insurance] at the expense of 85 percent of Americans who have some kind of coverage," Rogers says. Rogers supports finding other ways to cover the uninsured.

But Artnz sees it as a life or death issue.

"Everyone deserves to have health care," she says, "and to live as long as they can."

More Stories
Michigan to Host Stem Cell Summit

Flu & Pneumonia Vaccination Clinics Announced

Determining If You Have Swine Flu

Swine Flu Vaccine Q&A

Swine Flu Vaccine Delayed

Swine Flu Vaccine Will Be in Short Supply

Fact-Checking: Are Reports of "Death Panels" True or Not?

Health Care Reform Set up for September Showdown

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Pam Location: Jackson on Jul 1, 2009 at 04:30 PM
If the health industry was not subsidized by the government and insurance companies, we would see reasonable bills for health care. An average doctors office has four people working for them, two of them are dealing with the insurance companies and government red tape.

Posted by: David Location: Charlotte on Jul 1, 2009 at 02:33 PM
This is nothing but a grab of Apox. 1/3 of the US economy. Anyone that thinks that they will get better care under Gov. run care needs to have there head examened. Just look at what happens in Canada or other places where there is Gov. run Heath Care and remember that when they say that 47 mill. Americans dont have Heath Care half of them are ilegals. Just another way that the Gov. of this nation is going to control your life have fun living in the United States of Europe.

Posted by: Natural Law on Jul 1, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Since when did the human race decide we should be gauranteed jobs, healthcare. Our constitution says we have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Well the abortionist have taken away the right to life. The government is abolishing our liberties and the greed in this country is destroying our pursuit of happiness. It all starts in our nations capital where the elite think they are entitled and know what is best. Your vote and consumer spending are the only two things that you still control, for how long is another matter.

Posted by: patti Location: marquette on Jul 1, 2009 at 09:09 AM
i think the state of michigan should allow us seniors t have eyecare, dentistry and other stuff that is being tken away from us medicaid patients.

Posted by: Debbie Location: East Lansing on Jul 1, 2009 at 08:55 AM
I believe in health care reform. I have since I was old enought to vote. I don't think the government should pay for all of it, but maybe a portion. Health care, I feel is a right. Look what has been done to Soc. Sec. That was meant to be a trust for all older americans and it will soon disappear. I truly believe everyone should have access to health care

Posted by: St. James Location: St. Johns on Jul 1, 2009 at 07:52 AM
Why doesn't the question ask, Would you be willing to pay for others health care? The debate on health care is on the premise that government care do it better. Reality is a GUARANTEED NO! What makes Americans think that a rationed health care system under George Bush or Barak Obama is some sort of nirvana. Ms. Arntz says "Everyone deseerves to have health care and to live as long as they can". It seems to me her wishes have been meet and its still unfair. If we are $10 trillion indebt ($120,000 each) how can we afford to allow politicians the upper hand in our health care? When will we realize life is not fair? If you think you deserve something for free??? Ask a politician for a free hand out and you will get just what you deserve.

Posted by: Chris Location: dug out cave in mason on Jul 1, 2009 at 12:13 AM
As this health care reform debate continues, your gonna find out, republicans don't believe everybody is created equal. America will only survive if we become a community that works together, as opposed to every man for himself. Obama 2012

Posted by: jon on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:45 PM
I agree with Mike Rogers,Artnz misunderstood Mike,he too believes everyone deserves to have healthcare,instead of nationalizing,like Obama wants to,we need to find a better way,this insurance the govt has to offer,is not "HEALTHY" for any of us !!!!

Posted by: jen on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:38 PM
Theres whole lot of us,who are watching our senators to see who votes for this national health care plan.We don't want National Health care,There is a better way.

Posted by: mary on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:31 PM
Who doesn't want health care for everyone it's the kind of health care, I do not agree with Debbie Stabenow,Mike Rogers is on track,we don't need the government to tell us who our doctor will be and when we can see him.I have friends who live in Canada,they are still waiting in line to see a doctor,some of my friends have even moved to the United States to get away from this National health care. I vote NO on this!

Posted by: jen on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:21 PM
I agree with Mike Rogers,read what he has to say about Obama's health care plan. while I realize that everyone needs health care, we need to make sure that we aren't hooking national health care we want to chose for ourselves,the kind of plan that fits our needs,we want to chose our own doctors, not have the govt chose for us.

Posted by: tired of govt on Jun 30, 2009 at 11:11 PM
Mike Rogers has my vote.there are other ways to give insurance coverage to those who do not have it, keep the government out.Debbie Stabenow,knows that while we are offered other options,the goal is to nationalize,one big World.America has always figured out how to solve our problems, the govt doesn,t have to,let us have our jobs, and the rest will follow.