WILX Home ·  Station Info
     
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Downloads  ·   Apartment Guide  ·   Job Search  ·   Breakroom  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   Car Soup
Seen On 10 · Picture & Video Galleries · Recipes · Restaurants · Community · School Closings · Lottery · Entertainment · Money · Classifieds · Gas Prices
WILX Snapshot:
Share, View, & Vote
Caught in the Middle Save Email Print
Posted: 10:17 PM Jul 28, 2008
Last Updated: 1:26 PM Jul 29, 2008
Reporter: Jamie Edmonds
Email Address: jamie.edmonds@wilx.com

A | A | A

If a man's home is his castle...

"We have flowers and flower beds back there," Paul Veselovsky said. "I mow the lawn every two weeks."

Imagine Vesolovsky's surprise when a picture of his house showed up on a political ad.

"It showed our house and huge title that said 'neighborhood ruined,'" he said.

Needless to say it upset the family.

"I got home to my wife crying for three hours and an eight-year-old who thought we were going to be kicked out of the neighborhood for having such and ugly house," Veselovsky said.

The flyer, paid for by the Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce, is supposed to denounce Drain Commissioner Pat Lindeman's Rain Gardens project in the Towar neighborhood.

"It shows the horrible condition of the weeds in these ditches," Chamber spokesperson David Doyle said.

But the Vesolovskys said the ad only shows their forsythia bushes.

"f you're going to make a political point about rain gardens, why not show the rain gardens, why pick on our house?" Veselovsky asked.

Doyle stands by the ad, but apologizes for any hurt this has caused.

"The home isn't singled out." Doyle said. "We tried to make it look like the neighborhood. We made sure not tell people who's home this is, you don't know the street."

The family said that's not enough.

"They picked on us," Veselovsky said. "In the political war that's going on, we became collateral damage. In one blow we went from proud homeowners to people with the house that ruins neighborhoods."

More Stories
Firefighters Save Church, But Damage is Extensive

Fill A Cop Car

Fire Breaks out in Church

Some Say a GM Bankruptcy Is Not an Option

Charlotte On Edge After Escape

Shoppers Line Up for Savings

Black Friday Deals

Food Prices Up for Holidays

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: denise Location: mason on Oct 21, 2008 at 10:30 PM
You tell em' Veselovsky family! How awful, mean spirted and it sounds like they just don't even care it was offensive, and degrading they made you feel. HOW DARE THEY!! I am in outrage, they wonder why we don't trust and hate most politicians.

Posted by: Jimmy Location: Jackson on Jul 30, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Should not the photographer have gotten the homeowners permission to photograph their home? What is that had been the photographers wife in the shower, could that have been used without any recourse?

Posted by: Roger Location: Meridian on Jul 30, 2008 at 09:19 AM
The picture was portrayed to represent the rain garden that is in front of the home but because of the angle chosen for the picture it DOES NOT SHOW the rain garden. What this man calls “weeds” are actually forsythia bushes planted by the home owner several years ago. They are planted several feet behind the rain garden on the home owner’s property. If you want a picture showing what the condition of the rain garden was in a month ago, as he claimed, why not use a picture of the rain garden?

Posted by: Phil Location: Lansing on Jul 29, 2008 at 04:26 PM
The Lansing Chamber of Commerce is telling everyone that this is a "ruined" neighborhood and you're getting on this guy's back because YOU don't think he mows enough? What do you think the Chamber has done for property values in that area? Get some perspective lady!

Posted by: Kelly Location: Lansing on Jul 29, 2008 at 11:52 AM
He only mows once every two weeks?! There's nothing wrong with people not wanting to take care of their home and lawn. However, people who make those choices regarding their property should not live in a neighborhood because the rundown condition of their property can have an adverse financial impact on the property values of their neighbors. It's a simple concept. You are free to do whatever you wish ... unless and until it adversely affects someone else.

Posted by: tom Location: haslett on Jul 29, 2008 at 11:30 AM
Ok so the obvious question: Why is the Chamber so interested in politicizing a campaign? Is this just some right wing lap dog? Chambers are supposed to be pro-business but NOT favorable to one party or the other. Despicable.

Posted by: A Worker Location: Meridian Township on Jul 29, 2008 at 11:22 AM
The Chamber has sunk to a new low in the political game. Could they not find a bad picture of the rain gardens so they had to exploit this poor family’s hedge?!? Shame on you Chamber members!

Posted by: Mary Location: Pinckney, MI on Jul 29, 2008 at 09:23 AM
My daughter and her family live in that house. People are driving around the neighborhood to find the house!! It is NOT isolated. Since when does a Chamber of Commerce have the right to degrade anyone? This is not politics, it is mud slinging. Whomever took the picture DID NOT capture the rain garden. Go out and look again. The rain garden is in the drainage ditch. I have been there, I have enjoyed my daughter's gardens and I do not enjoy having them slandered. The Chamber made a mistake; the photographer made a mistake; and the politician who backed the photo against Mr. Lindemann made a mistake. Own up to it.

Posted by: greg Location: holt on Jul 29, 2008 at 06:32 AM
Political hacks should always stand behind their mistakes. I can just imagine what would have happened if it had been a picture of a "chamber" business.

Posted by: J Location: Jackson on Jul 29, 2008 at 06:17 AM
You really need a proof reader or use your spell check when writing your articles.

WILX Poll
Should The Government Have A Stake In The Big 3?

Yes
No


Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
  • Posted By: craigIf anyone in power was really concerned with helping people of lesser means we would be talking about bring jobs back to the USA where we can prosper and be proud of hard work again. how about a bailout for the countless unemployed AMERICANS, or parents on the brink of disaster that will last a lifetime.
  • Posted By: craiggovernment should help automakers at this point, however to say they (auto makers) are not responsible for the recession is absurd. how many more jobs can they push overseas before there will be no one left to purchase their products anyhow?
  • Posted By: BuzzWhy should the Big 3 be bailed out? GM wants to sell off our discontinue the Saturn, which is affordable but has made no mention of discontinuing the Corvette and other less affordable models. If GM wants help have them pick one particular model in each of its lines, i.e. the Lacrosse for Buick, Impala for Chevrolet and the Aura for Saturn. GM is about as impervious as the out-going President is - they just don't get it! I read and sympathize with the line workers who say they can't even afford to buy a new car from the company that they work for - that's pretty sad and certainly doesn't promote company solidarity. Like I've said before, make the Big 3 sell what's sitting at all the dealerships even if they have to take a loss before making another automobile. Why keep making what nobody wants at prices nobody wants to pay?
  • Posted By: BethThe Big 3 failure would be a major disaster - I agree. However, I don't feel that the government or tax payers should bail them out until they have made the same kinds of concessions that citizens, small business, and union members have already made. Begin by severely downsizing the execs and their benefits i.e. luxuries. Times are tough and they should share in the "recession life style" is part of the reason for decreased car sales. I need a newer car badly, but it's not on my shopping list any time soon. They are flying and driving nice cars. Get real! The union members have suffered considerable cuts already including loss of workers, benefits and wages. Make equal cuts in management, wages, and benefits, then look at union members' additional concessions, and financial aide from the government.
  • Posted By: jonlike i said we the workers will and are getting hurt.they gain we lose
  • Posted By: METhank you UAW, if the union would not have barganed until the big 3 couldn't afford it any more we would all be able to afford nice cars. I was in the union before and it definently isnt all peaches and cream. Sure they will fight to get you more but look what it has done.. Workers recieved more then the company could afford and now more may lose everything. Thanks again UAW. It is flat out B.S. that the government will bail out huge corporations but only give the autos a loan. Its all for the politicians gain, main street America has been hurting alot longer then wall street, but wall street affected the politicians pocket so they did something about it. Mr & Mrs politician help us out, cut your pay & benefits.......quit cutting ours.
  • Posted By: LegallyRadTo Explain: If the banks were not bailed out, that would have affected the big 3, and every other business that deals with the banks (show me one that doesn't). This has nothing to do with Bush. Big 3 are very poorly run, and concede too much to organized labor. The bail out will first be essentially worthless since it will amount to a drop in a bucket, and the companies just blow cash. They need to fail to preserve our American capitalistic economy. Chances are only one or two of them will go out of business, but if they properly restructure then they could be saved... restructuring means cutting labor costs and consolidating products. If you want to blame something, it's mostly due to the mortgage crisis which began with Carter and Clinton who refused to allow banks to ensure that people could actually pay for their loans because they felt it might be discrimination. Look where that policy got us. Bush just happens to be in office when their poorly built floor calapsed.
  • Posted By: MicheleI cannot believe that they are not going to bail out the Big 3.Ford is not even sure it is going to need the money. And why do the banks get bailouts with no questions asked but they make the Big 3 jump through hoops of fire and all they want to do is borrow the money...... Reid is an idiot, and doesn't have a clue of how manufacturing works and what the ramifications down the road will be. Including restraurant, stores, and other service industries closing and going out of business due to lack of business. Let's keep America working!
  • Posted By: George Bush did not run our country in the ditch. He crash it stright into the wall at 100/mph.
  • Posted By: patthis is one more reason we need to thank George Bush for running our country into the ditch!

Instant Alert
Download Free To Your Computer
WILX E-News
News Weather & Sports Delivered Daily
News 10 Mobile
News Sports & Weather On Your Phone
WILX Snapshot
Share, View, & Vote
Weather Source
Your 24 Hour Local Weather Channel
RSS
Get Your RSS Feeds Here
AP Videos
Sponsored Headlines