WILX Home ·  Station Info
     
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Downloads  ·   Apartment Guide  ·   Job Search  ·   Breakroom  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   Car Soup
Seen On 10 · Picture & Video Galleries · Recipes · Restaurants · Community · School Closings · Lottery · Entertainment · Money · Classifieds · Gas Prices
WILX Snapshot:
Share, View, & Vote
Drivers React to US-127/ I-496 Lane Changes Save Email Print
MDOT reduces the number of lanes on the US-127/ I-496 interchange, and drivers look forward to the changes.
Posted: 5:14 PM Oct 12, 2008
Last Updated: 9:20 PM Oct 13, 2008
Reporter: Tiffany Teasley
Email Address: Tiffany.Teasley@wilx.com

A | A | A

Ask any driver that takes the US-127/I-496 interchange, and they'll tell you it's more like NASCAR.

"Like a race track, there was very high speeds, people changing lanes, other people don't know what's happening with lanes ending and things like that and people getting cut off," said Scott Roberts, who drives on the interchange.

"Right there is a tough stretch," said Paul Maffett, a frequent driver on the interchange.

But that could soon change, effective Sunday, there's now one lane for Northbound US-127, one lane for Westbound I-496 and a decision lane in the middle.

Paul Maffett drives through the interchange at least once a day, and he says three lanes will make the interchange easier to understand, especially for out of town drivers.

"Mainly because you've got one stretch going one way and one stretch going the other way, if they take it down to three lanes instead of four, people would be able to figure it out," Maffett said.

"I think it would probably slow it down, so anything that slows it down would probably be a good thing," Roberts said.

With more traction on the roadway and now less lanes in the interchange, officials agree the new improvements are a safer solution for drivers.

"They're going to cut over, but with this new lane situation it should prevent them from running into somebody," said Sgt. Mark VandeWauwer of the East Lansing Police Department.

VandeWauwer says the coating recently applied to the pavement will also help in wet weather conditions.

"To increase the traction also which should help a lot, because often when it gets wet out there is when we have a lot of our problems," VandeWauwer said.

Problems they're hoping are a thing of the past.

More Stories
US 127 Accident Victim Identified

Stocks Fall

Senator Voices Opposition to Chrysler Bailout

Governor On National TV to Defend Auto Bailout

Bush's New Home

Teen Steals Cop Car, Taunts Police

Oil Prices Tumble

Worst Month For Retailers Since 1969

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Curt Location: Lansing on Oct 14, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Why are m-dot and ELPD so stupid? Speed limits were 55 before and need to go back down to 55!! What is the point of 70 in this area? Btw I drive this section more then any other person in central MI unless you drive commercial. Why dont we see more speed enforcement on 127 either? Why cant somone figure this out? Traffic Enforcement= less accidents. Hey ELPD ,I'm looking at you..you like to camp out on the Frandoor bridge, Look for other things besides speeding.lane change violations,signals,you know...LAWS! thank you,end rant..

Posted by: Matt Location: Parma on Oct 13, 2008 at 10:05 PM
It would work if every one would observe the signs and mind the speed limit, it's not the truck drivers, MDOT, it's the idiots that think they can make it there just a second faster without the person in front of them and all of the sudden they need to swerve over because they were being an idiot. Maybe the state police should run it more often and do random pull overs for seatbelt checks and safety issues. How many people would be paying fines to maintian the roads & police. Lets just all go back to max speed of 55 and save fuel, lives and road repair.

Posted by: Kelly Location: Jackson on Oct 13, 2008 at 04:32 PM
Better advance warning in the form of signs would go a long way in preventing accidents. Northbound and Southbound 127 in the areas of 96 East and West, Jolly Road and 496 need to be marked well in advance so people know which lanes end/merge and which lanes they need to be in.

Posted by: Tom Location: Holt on Oct 13, 2008 at 02:27 PM
This won't help any until the state police start giving the speeding truck drivers tickets. They have the freedom to go as fast as they want because they are on a deadline and time is money. I noticed that as the reporter was doing her report on the lane changes on the TV last night, there was a speeding truck passing all the slower vehicles as she was speaking. Go figure!

Posted by: joe Location: lansing on Oct 13, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Watch the traffic be backed up all the way back to jolly road now

Posted by: LegallyRad Location: Lansing on Oct 13, 2008 at 01:28 PM
The problem is that it gets too slow for residents and people who know their way around. One slower car can create a back-up miles down when the break checks happen. There is no reason to lower the amount of lanes, instead it would make more sense to have more signage for drivers to be aware of what is going to happen. Another two examples: drivers don't realize that the middle lane on south 127 will go to east 96 OR south to jackson. another spot is that drivers don't realize that 496 to south 127 doesn't immediately go into two lanes and when it does, it's the left-most lane that ends. both of those spots also create ridiculous lane changes because nobody knows. less lanes will create a bottle neck effect, especially at rush hours, and in turn end in far more rear-end accidents.

Posted by: Franklin Location: Mason on Oct 13, 2008 at 12:49 PM
MDOT is so lazy, they dont realize the problem is that you have 2 lanes going into a muliple lane intersection, they need to enlarge the 2 lanes to three for at least a mile back to give people more time to make their decisions There is still going to be lane hopping at the last minute because of the funnel effect they created

WILX Poll
Should The Government Have A Stake In The Big 3?

Yes
No


Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
  • Posted By: craigIf anyone in power was really concerned with helping people of lesser means we would be talking about bring jobs back to the USA where we can prosper and be proud of hard work again. how about a bailout for the countless unemployed AMERICANS, or parents on the brink of disaster that will last a lifetime.
  • Posted By: craiggovernment should help automakers at this point, however to say they (auto makers) are not responsible for the recession is absurd. how many more jobs can they push overseas before there will be no one left to purchase their products anyhow?
  • Posted By: BuzzWhy should the Big 3 be bailed out? GM wants to sell off our discontinue the Saturn, which is affordable but has made no mention of discontinuing the Corvette and other less affordable models. If GM wants help have them pick one particular model in each of its lines, i.e. the Lacrosse for Buick, Impala for Chevrolet and the Aura for Saturn. GM is about as impervious as the out-going President is - they just don't get it! I read and sympathize with the line workers who say they can't even afford to buy a new car from the company that they work for - that's pretty sad and certainly doesn't promote company solidarity. Like I've said before, make the Big 3 sell what's sitting at all the dealerships even if they have to take a loss before making another automobile. Why keep making what nobody wants at prices nobody wants to pay?
  • Posted By: BethThe Big 3 failure would be a major disaster - I agree. However, I don't feel that the government or tax payers should bail them out until they have made the same kinds of concessions that citizens, small business, and union members have already made. Begin by severely downsizing the execs and their benefits i.e. luxuries. Times are tough and they should share in the "recession life style" is part of the reason for decreased car sales. I need a newer car badly, but it's not on my shopping list any time soon. They are flying and driving nice cars. Get real! The union members have suffered considerable cuts already including loss of workers, benefits and wages. Make equal cuts in management, wages, and benefits, then look at union members' additional concessions, and financial aide from the government.
  • Posted By: jonlike i said we the workers will and are getting hurt.they gain we lose
  • Posted By: METhank you UAW, if the union would not have barganed until the big 3 couldn't afford it any more we would all be able to afford nice cars. I was in the union before and it definently isnt all peaches and cream. Sure they will fight to get you more but look what it has done.. Workers recieved more then the company could afford and now more may lose everything. Thanks again UAW. It is flat out B.S. that the government will bail out huge corporations but only give the autos a loan. Its all for the politicians gain, main street America has been hurting alot longer then wall street, but wall street affected the politicians pocket so they did something about it. Mr & Mrs politician help us out, cut your pay & benefits.......quit cutting ours.
  • Posted By: LegallyRadTo Explain: If the banks were not bailed out, that would have affected the big 3, and every other business that deals with the banks (show me one that doesn't). This has nothing to do with Bush. Big 3 are very poorly run, and concede too much to organized labor. The bail out will first be essentially worthless since it will amount to a drop in a bucket, and the companies just blow cash. They need to fail to preserve our American capitalistic economy. Chances are only one or two of them will go out of business, but if they properly restructure then they could be saved... restructuring means cutting labor costs and consolidating products. If you want to blame something, it's mostly due to the mortgage crisis which began with Carter and Clinton who refused to allow banks to ensure that people could actually pay for their loans because they felt it might be discrimination. Look where that policy got us. Bush just happens to be in office when their poorly built floor calapsed.
  • Posted By: MicheleI cannot believe that they are not going to bail out the Big 3.Ford is not even sure it is going to need the money. And why do the banks get bailouts with no questions asked but they make the Big 3 jump through hoops of fire and all they want to do is borrow the money...... Reid is an idiot, and doesn't have a clue of how manufacturing works and what the ramifications down the road will be. Including restraurant, stores, and other service industries closing and going out of business due to lack of business. Let's keep America working!
  • Posted By: George Bush did not run our country in the ditch. He crash it stright into the wall at 100/mph.
  • Posted By: patthis is one more reason we need to thank George Bush for running our country into the ditch!

Instant Alert
Download Free To Your Computer
WILX E-News
News Weather & Sports Delivered Daily
News 10 Mobile
News Sports & Weather On Your Phone
WILX Snapshot
Share, View, & Vote
Weather Source
Your 24 Hour Local Weather Channel
RSS
Get Your RSS Feeds Here
AP Videos
Sponsored Headlines