WILX Home ·  Station Info
     
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Downloads  ·   Apartment Guide  ·   Job Search  ·   Breakroom  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   Car Soup
Seen On 10 · Picture & Video Galleries · Recipes · Restaurants · Community · School Closings · Lottery · Entertainment · Money · Classifieds · Gas Prices
WILX Snapshot:
Share, View, & Vote
House Speaker to Fight Recall Ruling Save Email Print
Posted: 11:07 PM Aug 29, 2008
Last Updated: 11:07 PM Aug 29, 2008
Reporter: Associated Press

A | A | A

Michigan House Speaker Andy Dillon will continue his legal fight against a recall effort next week.
The Democrat from Wayne County's first bid to undo a court order that could result in a November recall election was rejected late Friday by a federal judge.
U.S. District Judge Robert Holmes Bell ruled earlier this week that a Michigan law blocking some signatures gathered in support of the recall is unconstitutional because it violates political speech rights. The judge ordered state officials to re-examine the recall petitions to see if there are enough valid signatures to make the ballot.
Dillon asked Bell to reconsider the ruling, but Bell rejected that motion Friday. Mark Fisk, a consultant helping Dillon fight the recall, said an appeal will be filed as early as Tuesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals.
Attorneys for Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land also have filed a document signaling the intent to appeal Bell's ruling.
Dillon was targeted for recall because of his leadership role in raising taxes last year as Michigan worked its way out of a budget crisis.
The key question is whether signatures from voters inside Dillon's district should be counted even if they were collected by petition circulators who live outside the district or weren't registered to vote. Michigan law says those signatures shouldn't be counted, but Bell wrote that the law violates First Amendment rights.
Recall supporters need 8,724 valid signatures to make the ballot. State election officials ruled they were 776 signatures short earlier this year and didn't allow the recall question to go on the August ballot. Michigan courts upheld the decision.
But recall supporters say the new federal ruling could make about 2,000 more signatures valid. That could give the group enough valid signatures to make the ballot.
Dillon supporters could question the validity of signatures for other reasons -- if they have time. Deadlines for printing ballots are fast approaching.
Dillon supporters say they should get time to challenge the signatures because recall backers used fraud and forgery in their campaign. Michigan State Police are investigating the fraud allegations.
Recall supporters filed nearly 16,000 signatures with state election officials, but thousands were thrown out for a variety of reasons.
Dillon already is up for re-election on the November ballot.

More Stories
Consumer Alert: New Rules For Telemarketers

Consumer Alert: Kia Recall

Update: Purse/Gift Card Owner Found

Cuts At Furniture Maker

Auto Execs Travel Doesn't Go Unnoticed

Jackson Church Fire Ruled As Accidental

Proposal For State to Buy GM Headquarters

LIVE VIDEO: The Senate holds a hearing on the state of the domestic auto industry.

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
WILX Poll
Should The Government Have A Stake In The Big 3?

Yes
No


Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
  • Posted By: BuzzWhy should the Big 3 be bailed out? GM wants to sell off our discontinue the Saturn, which is affordable but has made no mention of discontinuing the Corvette and other less affordable models. If GM wants help have them pick one particular model in each of its lines, i.e. the Lacrosse for Buick, Impala for Chevrolet and the Aura for Saturn. GM is about as impervious as the out-going President is - they just don't get it! I read and sympathize with the line workers who say they can't even afford to buy a new car from the company that they work for - that's pretty sad and certainly doesn't promote company solidarity. Like I've said before, make the Big 3 sell what's sitting at all the dealerships even if they have to take a loss before making another automobile. Why keep making what nobody wants at prices nobody wants to pay?
  • Posted By: BethThe Big 3 failure would be a major disaster - I agree. However, I don't feel that the government or tax payers should bail them out until they have made the same kinds of concessions that citizens, small business, and union members have already made. Begin by severely downsizing the execs and their benefits i.e. luxuries. Times are tough and they should share in the "recession life style" is part of the reason for decreased car sales. I need a newer car badly, but it's not on my shopping list any time soon. They are flying and driving nice cars. Get real! The union members have suffered considerable cuts already including loss of workers, benefits and wages. Make equal cuts in management, wages, and benefits, then look at union members' additional concessions, and financial aide from the government.
  • Posted By: jonlike i said we the workers will and are getting hurt.they gain we lose
  • Posted By: METhank you UAW, if the union would not have barganed until the big 3 couldn't afford it any more we would all be able to afford nice cars. I was in the union before and it definently isnt all peaches and cream. Sure they will fight to get you more but look what it has done.. Workers recieved more then the company could afford and now more may lose everything. Thanks again UAW. It is flat out B.S. that the government will bail out huge corporations but only give the autos a loan. Its all for the politicians gain, main street America has been hurting alot longer then wall street, but wall street affected the politicians pocket so they did something about it. Mr & Mrs politician help us out, cut your pay & benefits.......quit cutting ours.
  • Posted By: LegallyRadTo Explain: If the banks were not bailed out, that would have affected the big 3, and every other business that deals with the banks (show me one that doesn't). This has nothing to do with Bush. Big 3 are very poorly run, and concede too much to organized labor. The bail out will first be essentially worthless since it will amount to a drop in a bucket, and the companies just blow cash. They need to fail to preserve our American capitalistic economy. Chances are only one or two of them will go out of business, but if they properly restructure then they could be saved... restructuring means cutting labor costs and consolidating products. If you want to blame something, it's mostly due to the mortgage crisis which began with Carter and Clinton who refused to allow banks to ensure that people could actually pay for their loans because they felt it might be discrimination. Look where that policy got us. Bush just happens to be in office when their poorly built floor calapsed.
  • Posted By: MicheleI cannot believe that they are not going to bail out the Big 3.Ford is not even sure it is going to need the money. And why do the banks get bailouts with no questions asked but they make the Big 3 jump through hoops of fire and all they want to do is borrow the money...... Reid is an idiot, and doesn't have a clue of how manufacturing works and what the ramifications down the road will be. Including restraurant, stores, and other service industries closing and going out of business due to lack of business. Let's keep America working!
  • Posted By: George Bush did not run our country in the ditch. He crash it stright into the wall at 100/mph.
  • Posted By: patthis is one more reason we need to thank George Bush for running our country into the ditch!

Instant Alert
Download Free To Your Computer
WILX E-News
News Weather & Sports Delivered Daily
News 10 Mobile
News Sports & Weather On Your Phone
WILX Snapshot
Share, View, & Vote
Weather Source
Your 24 Hour Local Weather Channel
RSS
Get Your RSS Feeds Here
AP Videos
Sponsored Headlines