|
|
|
|
Posted: 9:03 PM Aug 29, 2008
Last Updated: 9:03 PM Aug 29, 2008
Reporter: GREG BEACHAM - Associated Press
|
|
|
|
|
BERKELEY, Calif. (AP) -- Six years after California coach Jeff Tedford made his first big splash with a victory over Michigan State, he's hoping the Golden Bears don't provide the same career opportunity to Mark Dantonio. Tedford was a rookie head coach with two home victories under his belt in 2002 when he took the long-struggling Golden Bears to East Lansing to meet the nationally ranked Spartans. Cal's emphatic 46-22 victory put Tedford's rebuilding work in the national spotlight and even earned a brief ranking for the Bears, who won just one game the previous year. "We've had some big wins here over the years, but I think that was one of the biggest," said Tedford, who now has six straight winning seasons at Cal. "It was a new coaching staff coming in, and it was pretty good test to go back there to their place. I think they were ranked No. 15 in the nation, something like that. ... I felt like when we left the field that day, there was a different confidence, a different belief that our guys had." Michigan State finally returns that visit Saturday night when Dantonio begins his second season 2,300 miles from home in Strawberry Canyon. Both teams made big changes after going 7-6 last year, and their meeting will be the first chance to evaluate those changes. The prospect of traveling all the way to the Bay Area for a tough opener against a perennial bowl team doesn't bother Dantonio, who's making clear strides in his rebuilding project at Michigan State. Cal's team speed and experience should provide a challenge "These are the reasons you come to Michigan State -- to play in these type of games," Dantonio said. "To go across the country and play in a game like this, to have all the alumni people from the West Coast and all the people coming from here on a Labor Day weekend come and watch you play." Cal will start Kevin Riley at quarterback over senior Nate Longshore, whose struggles last season were blamed for much of the Bears' 1-6 performance after a 5-0 start. Riley led Cal to a win in last year's Armed Forces Bowl, but hasn't begun a season as the club's starter. Many of Cal's top recruits in recent years were influenced by Tedford's remarkable turnaround in 2002, punctuated by that Michigan State game. Not Riley. "To be honest, I didn't even know that much about Cal football in 2002," Riley said. "What we did then won't help against Michigan State this time. They like to bring pressure and hit the quarterback so he's always thinking about it. We've got to be smart with the ball and not play like it's our first game together. We've been together in practice long enough to be better than that." In fact, Cal's entire offense is dramatically new, except for the offensive line. With the departures of skill players Justin Forsett, DeSean Jackson, Lavelle Hawkins, Robert Jordan and Craig Stevens, the Bears will have newcomers or former part-timers at every key offensive position around center Alex Mack, the returning leader of the offensive line. "They come off the ball pretty fast, and they're not afraid to hit you," said Mack, who graduated during the summer but decided to return for his senior season. "It's going to be fun no matter what, though. It's fun to hit a different color. Starting off the season with such a good team is going to be fun." Cal has had a 1,000-yard rusher in each of Tedford's six seasons, and speedy Jahvid Best could continue that tradition if he gets enough carries. But the best running back in Saturday's game is likely to be Michigan State's Javon Ringer, last season's team MVP after recording the Spartans' first 1,000-yard season in six years. Ringer pops out on game film to the Bears, who recognize elements of Forsett's fast, low-to-the-ground style. But Ringer is a bigger back who could cause major problems for Cal's rebuilt line in its new 3-4 defense, designed to take advantage of the Bears' wealth of linebacker talent. "I know their offensive line is big, but Alex Mack is probably the No. 1 offensive lineman in the country," Cal linebacker Worrell Williams said. "We get that test every day in practice. ... We're going in there with a mentality of stopping the run, even though Ringer looks real good. He'll break a lot of tackles. Those legs will continue to move, no matter what."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expert: Big 3 Failure Would Be Disaster
- Posted By: craig: If anyone in power was really concerned with helping people of lesser means we would be talking about bring jobs back to the USA where we can prosper and be proud of hard work again. how about a bailout for the countless unemployed AMERICANS, or parents on the brink of disaster that will last a lifetime.
- Posted By: craig: government should help automakers at this point, however to say they (auto makers) are not responsible for the recession is absurd. how many more jobs can they push overseas before there will be no one left to purchase their products anyhow?
- Posted By: Buzz: Why should the Big 3 be bailed out? GM wants to sell off our discontinue the Saturn, which is affordable but has made no mention of discontinuing the Corvette and other less affordable models. If GM wants help have them pick one particular model in each of its lines, i.e. the Lacrosse for Buick, Impala for Chevrolet and the Aura for Saturn. GM is about as impervious as the out-going President is - they just don't get it! I read and sympathize with the line workers who say they can't even afford to buy a new car from the company that they work for - that's pretty sad and certainly doesn't promote company solidarity. Like I've said before, make the Big 3 sell what's sitting at all the dealerships even if they have to take a loss before making another automobile. Why keep making what nobody wants at prices nobody wants to pay?
- Posted By: Beth: The Big 3 failure would be a major disaster - I agree. However, I don't feel that the government or tax payers should bail them out until they have made the same kinds of concessions that citizens, small business, and union members have already made. Begin by severely downsizing the execs and their benefits i.e. luxuries. Times are tough and they should share in the "recession life style" is part of the reason for decreased car sales. I need a newer car badly, but it's not on my shopping list any time soon. They are flying and driving nice cars. Get real! The union members have suffered considerable cuts already including loss of workers, benefits and wages. Make equal cuts in management, wages, and benefits, then look at union members' additional concessions, and financial aide from the government.
- Posted By: jon: like i said we the workers will and are getting hurt.they gain we lose
- Posted By: ME: Thank you UAW, if the union would not have barganed until the big 3 couldn't afford it any more we would all be able to afford nice cars. I was in the union before and it definently isnt all peaches and cream. Sure they will fight to get you more but look what it has done.. Workers recieved more then the company could afford and now more may lose everything. Thanks again UAW. It is flat out B.S. that the government will bail out huge corporations but only give the autos a loan. Its all for the politicians gain, main street
America has been hurting alot longer then wall street, but wall street affected the politicians pocket so they did something about it. Mr & Mrs politician help us out, cut your pay & benefits.......quit cutting ours.
- Posted By: LegallyRad: To Explain: If the banks were not bailed out, that would have affected the big 3, and every other business that deals with the banks (show me one that doesn't). This has nothing to do with Bush. Big 3 are very poorly run, and concede too much to organized labor. The bail out will first be essentially worthless since it will amount to a drop in a bucket, and the companies just blow cash. They need to fail to preserve our American capitalistic economy. Chances are only one or two of them will go out of business, but if they properly restructure then they could be saved... restructuring means cutting labor costs and consolidating products. If you want to blame something, it's mostly due to the mortgage crisis which began with Carter and Clinton who refused to allow banks to ensure that people could actually pay for their loans because they felt it might be discrimination. Look where that policy got us. Bush just happens to be in office when their poorly built floor calapsed.
- Posted By: Michele: I cannot believe that they are not going to bail out the Big 3.Ford is not even sure it is going to need the money. And why do the banks get bailouts with no questions asked but they make the Big 3 jump through hoops of fire and all they want to do is borrow the money...... Reid is an idiot, and doesn't have a clue of how manufacturing works and what the ramifications down the road will be. Including restraurant, stores, and other service industries closing and going out of business due to lack of business. Let's keep America working!
- Posted By: : George Bush did not run our country in the ditch. He crash it stright into the wall at 100/mph.
- Posted By: pat: this is one more reason we need to thank George Bush for running our country into the ditch!
|