WILX Home ·  Station Info
   
News  ·   Sports  ·   Weather  ·   Job Search  ·   Blogs  ·   Contests  ·   iWitness Photo/Video  ·   10toGo  ·   Instant Alert  ·   World News
Recipes · Restaurants · Community · School Closings · Lottery · Entertainment · Money · Breakroom · Apartment Guide · Repair Don’t Replace · Summer Guide
WILX.com on Demand
News Ten Mobile
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Instant Alert
Breaking News and
Weather Alerts
On Your Computer
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
Delivered Via Email
WILX iWitness
Submit Your Pics
and Video
Weather Source
Your 24 Hour Local
Weather Channel
Twitter
News Headlines
Short and Sweet
WILX iWitness
Will Michigan Voters Vote Again? Save Email Print
Posted: 9:42 PM Mar 5, 2008
Last Updated: 1:37 AM Mar 6, 2008
Reporter: Lauren Zakalik
Email Address: lauren.zakalik@wilx.com

A | A | A

Michigan superdelegate Joel Ferguson is very much looking forward to the Democratic National Convention in August.

"I blocked it off on my calendar," he says. "We'll be there."

But as of now, Ferguson won't be participating.

Because Michigan moved up its primary date, the Democratic party-- as punishment-- took away all our delegates. Same with Florida.

But with Clinton and Obama neck-and-neck, Michigan's votes matter now more than ever-- and state politicians are scrambling to make sure our votes count.

"It'll be very tough, especially on the Democratic side, to say 'it's ok not to seat two of the 10 largest states," says political analyst Jeff Williams, who works for Public Sector Consultants in Lansing.

Williams says delegates will be seated-- but in what manner is the question. If the party downright refuses to seat delegates, Michigan Democratic voters could be facing a complete re-vote or a caucus.

"The closer the two candidates are, the more pallatable a revote will be to heal the party," Williams says.

Ferguson, who supports Clinton, also supports a re-vote.

"If we do a revote, people are at least open to discussion" if the DNC doesn't seat our delegates, Ferguson says.

Until Wednesday, Governor Granholm had rejected the idea of a re-vote. But now, after private discussions, she might be behind the idea.

The Associated Press is reporting a potential "Firehouse" vote in Michigan, which is a shorter, smaller-scale primary.

Williams says whatever the way, Michigan and Florida must be counted.

"Vote for someone who 48 states thinks is pretty good? That doesnt sound like good democracy to me," he says.

But for now, that's the reality for Michigan.

The biggest challenge, however, if Michigan were to do a re-vote would be money. Primaries are expensive. It cost the state of Michigan-- and its taxpayers-- around $10 million in January. Ferguson says before we could ever put on a re-vote, we'd have to find a way to fund the vote.

More Stories
Gearing Up For Common Ground

Home Foreclosure Help

Detroit's Emergency Cash

Chrysler Fills Out Board Members

Single Engine Plane Makes Emergency Landing At Local Airport

Two Men Found Dead in Kalamazoo River

Husband, Wife Take Spitting Crowns

Human Remains Identified

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Kenneth D. Franks Location: Texas on Mar 7, 2008 at 07:05 AM
Why doesen't the Democratic Party me included send in contributions to fund this and then settle which candidate will be our candidate. I'm good for 10.00 KDF

Posted by: John Location: Lansing on Mar 6, 2008 at 08:15 AM
Michigan powers that be were made well aware and well in advace the cost of moving up the primary. The fact that the Gov' is whining again makes no difference. The only surprise is that the race between Osama and Bill's wife is too close to call. IF the candidates wernt so closely matched in their incompetence the race would already be over and the Michgian vote would not matter. But as usual the Dem's screwed things up by #1) Not having a Strong winner (They have losts of whiners) by now and #2) by trying to change things mid-stream. Good luck to all Americans if either Osama of Bill's wife wins the election.

Posted by: Jeff Location: Okemos on Mar 5, 2008 at 11:22 PM
I do not care if the Democrats get to seat their delegates or not. All I do know is that there better not be one penny spent by the State of Michigan on this re-do if it takes place. That means no public buildings, no state workers, no state or local officials being paid in any way! This re-do must be completely funded by the Michigan democrats with personally raised money. I would also call for a complete audit and accounting of the process.

Posted by: Karen Location: Michigan on Mar 5, 2008 at 09:56 PM
Don't seat my delegates. The National Democratic Party makes it very easy for me. As a Democrat who always votes straight ticket, you might be surprised that will simply be voting for the REPUBLICAN candidate in the Presidential Election and, further, I will be voting straight-ticket Republican all of the way. What the DNC needs to understand is that it does not matter if Obama or Clinton wins the party's nomination. Seat our delegates unconditionaly. No new primaries in Michigan and Florida. No new caucuses or "firehouses". As Carl Levin said, "Given that 600,000 Michigan voters participated in a primary that was held in accordance with Michigan law, it seems to me that it would not be practical or fair to throw out the results of that election". Accept our delegates as elected in the States of Florida and Michigan. If the DNC does not, it makes our decision as voters easy. If the DNC does not seat our delegates they are turning their backs on the people of the State of Michig

AP Videos
WILX Poll
Do You Make A Point To Buy Local Food During Holidays?

Yes
No


King of Pop Leaves Mark on Lansing
King of Pop Leaves Mark on Lansing
  • Posted By: BarbaraI'm surprised by the news media who are shocked that he died after having passed a physical. There are instances of people having heart attacks as they leave the doctors office, have been given a good bill of health. Some coverage of the event seems appropriate but now I am ready for it to stop. Ok I wasn't a fan. Never was. But enough is enough. There is other news out there. There were other deaths of famous people that week, alot in fact. They got a notice in the news and that was appropriate. Yes was more controversial as was Elvis and yes they both got more time, but it bothers me that all of the national coverage that night was of his death as if there wasn't a war or other news of note.
  • Posted By: Entertaiment BigotSorry Becky if we busted his chops but I'm one of those Hollywood Bigots. I do not idolize anyone in the entertainment business more than I would my own Parents. So I can truly say he never had an impact on me. It is our culture and media that seems who decide who we should idolize and I'm sorry but I don't buy into that mentality. I didn't cry over Elvis and I'm not shedding a tear for Mr. Jackson. I didn't cry over Lady Di. To say he reached everyone in the world may be true but that doesn't make me a bigot just because I don't idolize or mourn him.
  • Posted By: BeckyI feel that you are all insenstive bigots. Excuse the past years...you have to look at what this man meant to the country as a whole. When is the last time you heard of an artist that reached damn near everyone in the WORLD regardless of their race? Elvis didn't even have that much of an impact. He is a human and has his mistakes. Only God can judge him and to say such nasty things about this man after his passings is plain disgusting.
  • Posted By: blablaOk he's dead, now can we read some real news
  • Posted By: jonI just wonder where is michael now?
  • Posted By: sandyBill, your right not Farrah or Ed but a pedophile, his attorneys will be looking for new jobs now cant live off mike now.
  • Posted By: BillWhat GREAT comments and all so true. How anyone can worship a pedophile is beyond me. To bad about Farrah, but you sure don't hear anything about her.
  • Posted By: BillToo bad so sad, NOT. Children of L.A, can now sleep easier. The courts don't have to waste money on him anymore and his so called friends will have to find someone else they can be a leach to. I remember when their show first appeared and it was fun to watch. But as time goes by the fame has destroyed him as well as all the damage he has done to his own body for no reason but to be wanted even more by the public. His attorney summed it up great.
  • Posted By: King of WarpOk, the immediate response is I'm shocked. Only the media and elite will sensationalize a story to make the guy out to be somebody to be worshipped. Everyone is now over Princess Di. So, pay your respects, honor his talent and keep the other crap out of the news. We don't need to hear over and over again about his drug use, child molestation problems. Good-Bye Michael Jackson now "Beat It"
  • Posted By: MarkThis is pathetic. Call me a dork, or a hater, or whatever, but this is seriously ridiculous. Yeah, an influential musician is dead at a young age. But do half of the headlines on this page have to be about Michael Jackson? There are four on here about him out of 8 listed.
  • Posted By: CarrieBS! I don't buy into this "sadness" stuff. I think we have a bunch of band-wagon jumpers!! Michael was a HUGE part of my generation's world (growing up in the 80s) and every chick LOVED him so from that sense, ok...it is weird to see him gone. BUT....he was a "has been" through the recent years (since like the mid 90s?) and so many people did NOT like him because of his life-style and mannerisms, etc. Notice his upcoming tour was in a whole other COUNTRY because he wouldn't make it here. But yet, all of a sudden, he is LOVED by all? GIVE ME A BREAK! I am NOT buying it. BAND-WAGON jumpers. Spare me.
Sponsored Headlines