2008 Election Home · Meet the Nominees · Select a Candidate · 2008 Primary & Caucus Dates · Voter Resources · Addressing the Issues · About the U.S. Electoral College · WILX Home
Political Poll
There are currently no active polls at this time.
Click here to view other polls on our site and past poll results.
Former Candidate Wants Michigan Delegates Split Save Email Print
Posted: 2:43 PM Mar 11, 2008
Last Updated: 2:43 PM Mar 11, 2008
Reporter: Associated Press

A | A | A

Sen. Christopher Dodd said Monday there's a simple way to end the wrangling between Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama over Florida and Michigan delegates: divide them evenly between the two Democratic presidential candidates.
"Split up the delegations, let 'em each have 50 percent of it and move on," said Dodd. "You don't have to go back over and re-do these things."
Added Dodd: "My view is make this as simple as you can."
The Connecticut Democrat, an Obama backer and former 2008 presidential hopeful, said such a move would save taxpayers from having to pay for do-over primaries that some Democrats have proposed.
"I don't like the idea that taxpayers will have to pay," said Dodd. "Why should they have to pay twice?"
Dodd said holding primaries again would wrongly reward the two states for trying to jump ahead of other states on the national party's primary and caucus calendar.
"There's gotta be a price you pay for this thing," Dodd said.
The Democratic National Committee have stripped Florida and Michigan of their delegates for holding their primaries too early.
Florida and Michigan had moved up their dates to protest the party's decision to allow Iowa and New Hampshire to go first, followed by South Carolina and Nevada, giving them a disproportionate influence on the presidential selection process.
Clinton won both the Florida and Michigan contests, but the results were meaningless because the elections violated national party rules. Obama did not appear on Michigan's ballot.
The disqualifications created a headache for the party due to the closeness of the race. Officials from both states are trying to resolve the issue before the national convention in late August so their delegates can be counted.
Obama currently has more delegates than Clinton, but that could change if Clinton were to win a large enough portion of Florida and Michigan's delegates. Dodd's proposal to split the delegates would keep Obama in the delegate lead.
Some in the party have proposed having major Democratic donors pay for the do-over primaries instead of taxpayers. Dodd rejected that approach.
"The idea that a bunch of fat cats are gonna finance it, I don't like that idea at all," Dodd said.
Dodd said he had not talked with Obama or any party officials about the idea of evenly splitting the Florida and Michigan delegates.
There also have been proposals floated for mail-in primaries to give Florida and Michigan Democrats a voice in electing a candidate for president. Cost and security issues, however have been raised. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has said the national party needs its money for the general election campaign against Republican John McCain.
Dodd's remarks on delegate dispute came after a speech to members of the International Association of Fire Fighters, which supported his presidential bid.

More Stories
Obama, McCain Bury Campaign Pain, Vow Cooperation

Franken Hones Absentee Case Ahead Of Minn. Recount

Two Michigan Candidates May Run for RNC Chairmanship

Big Names Rumored for Possible Cabinet Positions

Bush, Obama Discuss Economy, Foreign Policy

Speculation Over Governor Leaving

Gun Sales And Elections

Cox Puts Wheels In Motion to Run for Governor

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Rick Lilly Location: Lansing on Mar 11, 2008 at 08:09 AM
How can a redo be fair? Do you put the name John Edwards on the ballot? He was still a viable candidate at the time and given Michigan Democrats's penchant for voting outside the mainstream (Jesse Jackson, Geoffry Feiger) it would be conceivable that Edwards might have won. Or is this simply going to be a Hillary against Barak vote? The Democrats knew at the time that they were breaking the rules and they should live by the consequences instead of hoping everyone else will give them a "do-over." Pretty pathetic.

Posted by: Kristy Location: MI on Mar 10, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Typical Democrats, always wanting to change the rules to suite their needs! They do the same with words as well. ! Watch out for REV Sharpton, he will be on the band wagon, as he doesnt want the delegates divided, he wants em all for Obama. Just wait , he is ready to march on this issue, if any delegates get switched to Hillary.. People wake up , this is becoming a RACE issue before our eyes!

Campaign 2008 AP Video
Stay Connected With News Ten

   10 to Go
   News Weather & Video

   Breaking News & Weather
   Download Free to Your Computer

   My 10
   Submit Your Pictures and Videos Here

   Blogs
   News Sports Weather Life

   Espanol
   Clic Aqui Para Leer En Espanol

   Tell Us More
   Tell Us More

   RSS
   Get Your RSS Feeds Here RSS Readers    and Codes

   Weather Source
   24 Hour Local  Weather Channel

   Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce
   Latest Developments in Mid-Michigan